From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pauldo v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division
Dec 10, 2008
CV 308-011 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 10, 2008)

Opinion

CV 308-011.

December 10, 2008


ORDER


After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, the Commissioner's final decision is REVERSED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further consideration in accordance the Court's opinion.

SO ORDERED, at Augusta, Georgia.


Summaries of

Pauldo v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division
Dec 10, 2008
CV 308-011 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 10, 2008)
Case details for

Pauldo v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:THELMA PAULDO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Dublin Division

Date published: Dec 10, 2008

Citations

CV 308-011 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 10, 2008)

Citing Cases

Samuels v. Astrue

The Court will not endeavor to determine the appropriate weight that should be afforded the treating…

Rogers v. Colvin

Nor is it a requirement that the ALJ specifically reference redundant or duplicative testimony where it is…