From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paul v. Rimrock Tidelands, Inc.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Third Circuit
Mar 15, 1961
128 So. 2d 443 (La. Ct. App. 1961)

Opinion

No. 229.

March 15, 1961.

Proceeding on appeal from the Ninth Judicial District Court, Parish of Rapides, Walter M. Hunter, J. The Court of Appeal, Tate, J., held that the appeal would be considered abandoned and would be dismissed where the appellant did not appear in person or through counsel and filed no brief.

Appeal dismissed.

John M. Sherrill, III, Lloyd G. Teekell, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellant.

Stafford Pitts, by John L. Pitts, Alexandria, for defendants-appellees.

Before TATE, FRUGÉ, and CULPEPPER, JJ.


The appellant did not appear in person or through counsel when this case was called for argument on the date it had been docketed for hearing, nor was any brief filed on his behalf. The appeal is therefore considered abandoned, and it will accordingly be dismissed. Rule VII, Section 4(b), Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal (1960); Allen v. Cuba, La. App., 3 Cir., 125 So.2d 429, and the authorities therein cited. The costs of this appeal are assessed against the plaintiff-appellant. LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2164.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Paul v. Rimrock Tidelands, Inc.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Third Circuit
Mar 15, 1961
128 So. 2d 443 (La. Ct. App. 1961)
Case details for

Paul v. Rimrock Tidelands, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:William L. PAUL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RIMROCK TIDELANDS, INC., et al.…

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Third Circuit

Date published: Mar 15, 1961

Citations

128 So. 2d 443 (La. Ct. App. 1961)

Citing Cases

Viser v. Viser

"Consider abandoned and dismiss the appeal in any case in which the appellant has neither appeared nor filed…

Slay v. Babin Motors, Inc.

Therefore, the appeal is considered abandoned and accordingly dismissed with appellate costs against the…