Opinion
2:22-cv-4090
10-24-2023
PAUL S., Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.
Karen L. Litkovitz Magistrate Judge
ORDER
SARAH D. MORRISON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application for supplemental security income. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff filed his Statement of Errors on April 3, 2023. (ECF No. 10.) On October 2, 2023, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the Court overrule Plaintiff's Statement of Errors and affirm the Commissioner's denial of benefits. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff timely filed his Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 13.) The Commissioner responded. (ECF No. 14.)
If a party objects within the allotted time to a report and recommendation, the Court “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Upon review, the Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court's review “is limited to determining whether the Commissioner's decision ‘is supported by substantial evidence and was made pursuant to proper legal standards.'” Ealy v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 594 F.3d 504, 512 (6th Cir. 2010) (quoting Rogers v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 486 F.3d 234, 241 (6th Cir. 2007)); see also 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (“The findings of the Commissioner of Social Security as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive ....”).
The Court has carefully reviewed the record and concludes that the decision of the Commissioner is supported by substantial evidence and was made pursuant to proper legal standards. The issue raised in Plaintiff's Objection was considered and correctly addressed by the Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiff's Objection (ECF No. 13), ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12), and AFFIRMS the Commissioner's decision. The Clerk is DIRECTED to TERMINATE this case from the docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.