From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pauda v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 6, 1995
647 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

Nos. 94-1076, 94-1077.

January 6, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County; Newman D. Brock, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and James T. Cook, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ann M. Childs, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a sentence wherein appellant was given improper consecutive enhanced sentences. Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1993), cert. den., ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994); Brooks v. State, 630 So.2d 527 (Fla. 1993); Horn v. State, 642 So.2d 1209 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Without giving notice, the appellant, over his objection, was required to pay a public defender "lien." See Fontenont v. State, 631 So.2d 379 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Jones v. State, 623 So.2d 627 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Smith v. State, 622 So.2d 638 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). Appellee confesses error by "acknowledging the holdings" of the pertinent case law.

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

COBB and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pauda v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 6, 1995
647 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Pauda v. State

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL PAUDA, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 6, 1995

Citations

647 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Sims v. State

The defendant alleges he was given improper consecutive enhanced habitual offender sentences in three…