From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. Corner Rock Realty, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 23, 2010
71 A.D.3d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

Nos. 2009-01484 2009-02960.

March 23, 2010.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (O'Rourke, J.), dated January 30, 2009, as granted the motion of the defendants Corner Rock Realty, Inc., and Dutch's Tavern Café for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and (2) so much of an order of the same court dated March 19, 2009, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination.

Goldblatt Associates, P.C., Mohegan Lake, N.Y. (Kenneth B. Goldblatt of counsel), for appellants.

Murphy Lambiase, Goshen, N.Y. (George A. Smith of counsel), for respondents.

Spiegel Brown Fichera Coté, LLP, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Michael A. Coté of counsel), for third-party defendant.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Angiolillo, Dickerson and Roman, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the appeal from the order dated January 30, 2009, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated March 19, 2009, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated March 19, 2009, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents. The defendants Corner Rock Realty, Inc., and Dutch's Tavern Cafe (hereinafter the defendants) established, prima facie, their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the plaintiffs were unable to identify what caused the injured plaintiff to trip and fall ( see Starling v Suffolk County Water Auth., 63 AD3d 822; Reiff v Beechwood Browns Rd. Bldg. Corp., 54 AD3d 1015; Denicola v Costello, 44 AD3d 990). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Since the plaintiffs submitted the defendants' expert medical report in opposition to the defendants' motion, they waived any objection to its admissibility ( see Field v Waldbaum, Inc., 35 AD3d 652, 653-654; Raso v Statewide Auto Auction, 262 AD2d 387, 387-388).

In light of our determination, we need not address the parties' remaining contentions.


Summaries of

Patterson v. Corner Rock Realty, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 23, 2010
71 A.D.3d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Patterson v. Corner Rock Realty, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARY JANE PATTERSON et al., Appellants, v. CORNER ROCK REALTY, INC., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 23, 2010

Citations

71 A.D.3d 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 2526
896 N.Y.S.2d 881

Citing Cases

Rivera v. J. Nazzaro P'ship, L.P.

There is, however, insufficient evidence submitted to resolve the motion on this issue. Here, defendant…

Kadashev v. Medina

In support of his motion, the plaintiff submitted his own affidavit, in which he alleged, inter alia, that…