From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 14, 2013
5:11-CV-1143 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2013)

Summary

finding the ALJ did not err in limiting plaintiff to simple, routine, repetitive tasks where the consultative examiner determined that plaintiff's difficulty handling stress would not preclude plaintiff from undertaking simple, routine, repetitive tasks

Summary of this case from Tatum v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

5:11-CV-1143

02-14-2013

MANDI LYNNE PATTERSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

APPEARANCES: OLINSKY LAW GROUP One Park Place Attorneys for Plaintiff HON. RICHARD S. HARTUNIAN United States Attorney Northern District of New York Attorney for Defendant OF COUNSEL: KAREN S. SOUTHWICK, ESQ. VERNON NORWOOD, ESQ. Special Ass't U.S. Attorney


(MAD/DEP)

APPEARANCES:

OLINSKY LAW GROUP
One Park Place
Attorneys for Plaintiff
HON. RICHARD S. HARTUNIAN
United States Attorney
Northern District of New York
Attorney for Defendant

OF COUNSEL:

KAREN S. SOUTHWICK, ESQ. VERNON NORWOOD, ESQ.
Special Ass't U.S. Attorney

MAE A. D'AGOSTINO, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

The above matter comes to me following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles, duly filed on the 24th day of January 2013. Following fourteen (14) days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent me the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.

After careful review of all of the papers herein, including the Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, and no objections submitted thereto, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The Report-Recommendation is hereby adopted in its entirety.

2. The Plaintiff is granted judgment on the pleadings and the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied.

3. The Clerk is directed to close the case and enter judgment accordingly.

4. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon all parties and the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 14, 2013

Albany, New York

________

Mae A. D'Agostino

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Patterson v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 14, 2013
5:11-CV-1143 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2013)

finding the ALJ did not err in limiting plaintiff to simple, routine, repetitive tasks where the consultative examiner determined that plaintiff's difficulty handling stress would not preclude plaintiff from undertaking simple, routine, repetitive tasks

Summary of this case from Tatum v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Patterson v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MANDI LYNNE PATTERSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Feb 14, 2013

Citations

5:11-CV-1143 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2013)

Citing Cases

Tatum v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Dr. Noia opined that Plaintiff, despite his difficulties in dealing with stress, was capable of understanding…