From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patten v. Nagy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 1984
99 A.D.2d 801 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

February 21, 1984


In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, defendant seller appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Beerman, J.), entered June 8, 1983, which, inter alia, ordered defendant to specifically perform a contract by transferring title to the property in question to plaintiffs within 120 days after entry of the judgment. Judgment affirmed, with costs. This appeal brings up for review the factual determination by the trial court that there had been an oral modification of the contract of sale, extending the time for plaintiffs to obtain a mortgage commitment (see Patten v Nagy, 86 A.D.2d 890). The resolution of this issue of fact turned on the assessment by the trial court of the witnesses' credibility, and will not be disturbed by this court (see, e.g., Rametta v Kazio, 68 A.D.2d 579; Matter of Susan W. v Ahmad Q., 65 A.D.2d 594, mot. for lv. to app den. 46 N.Y.2d 1037). O'Connor, J.P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Patten v. Nagy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 1984
99 A.D.2d 801 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Patten v. Nagy

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN J. PATTEN et al., Respondents, v. GEORGE NAGY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 21, 1984

Citations

99 A.D.2d 801 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Richman v. Federated Adjustment Company

The parties presented conflicting evidence with respect to whether the plaintiffs were the brokers of record…

Matter of Bogert v. Rickard

We cannot agree that petitioner's version of the events should be accepted inasmuch as there is ample basis…