From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patrick v. Glass

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 6, 1988
374 S.E.2d 229 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

77290.

DECIDED OCTOBER 6, 1988.

Dispossessory. Henry Superior Court. Before Judge Whitmire.

Lennie W. Jones, for appellant.

Christopher C. Covey, Monroe Ferguson, for appellee.

Gilbert Glass, pro se.


Pursuant to OCGA § 44-7-54 (b), the trial court granted appellee-plaintiff landlord a writ of possession, finding that appellant-defendant had failed to pay the requisite rental payments into the registry of court. Appellant brings this direct appeal from that order. While the grant of a writ of possession is usually a final order which may or may not be directly appealable (see OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (3)), the record in this case shows that there are other claims which remain pending in the trial court. "Where there is a case involving multiple... claims, a decision adjudicating fewer than all the claims... is not a final judgment. [Cit.] In such circumstances, there must be an express determination under OCGA § 9-11-54 (b) [(cit.)] or there must be compliance with the requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b) [(cit.)]. Where neither of these code sections are followed..., the appeal is premature and must be dismissed. [Cits.]" Spivey v. Rogers, 167 Ga. App. 729 ( 307 S.E.2d 677) (1983). Because the appropriate appellate procedure was not followed in this multiple-claim case, the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed. Deen, P. J., and Sognier, J., concur.

DECIDED OCTOBER 6, 1988.


Summaries of

Patrick v. Glass

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 6, 1988
374 S.E.2d 229 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Patrick v. Glass

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK v. GLASS

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 6, 1988

Citations

374 S.E.2d 229 (Ga. Ct. App. 1988)
374 S.E.2d 229

Citing Cases

Whiddon v. Stargell

)] or there must be compliance with the requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b) [(cit.)]. Where neither of these…

Pettus v. Drs. Paylay, Frank Brown, P.C

Consequently, as this appeal is not the appeal of a grant of summary judgment against Pettus, it cannot be…