From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pastor v. R.A.K. Tennis Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 2000
278 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued December 4, 2000.

December 19, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant R.A.K. Tennis Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dollard, J.), dated January 12, 2000, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Feder, Goldstein, Tanenbaum, D'Errico Arnedos, LLP, Carle Place, N Y (April D. Adell of counsel), for appellant.

Crupain Greenfield, New York, N.Y. (Paul Greenfield of counsel), for respondents.

Before: WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, HOWARD MILLER, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Christina Pastor, a patron of a restaurant maintained and operated on premises owned by the appellant, was allegedly injured when a sand-filled table base was dropped on her foot. The plaintiffs brought this action alleging that the defendants were negligent in the ownership, operation, management, maintenance, and control of the premises. The Supreme Court denied the appellant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

It is well settled that "an out-of-possession landlord cannot be held liable for injuries that occur on its premises unless the landlord has retained control over the premises, or over the operation of the business conducted on the property" (Borelli v. 1051 Realty Corp., 242 A.D.2d 517, 518; see, Dalzell v. McDonald's Corp., 220 A.D.2d 638). As there are material issues of fact regarding the appellant's control over the premises, and the operation of the restaurant on the property, summary judgment was properly denied (see, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562).


Summaries of

Pastor v. R.A.K. Tennis Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 19, 2000
278 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Pastor v. R.A.K. Tennis Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTINA PASTOR, ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. R.A.K. TENNIS CORP., ETC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 19, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 633

Citing Cases

Portaro v. Tillis Investment Company

Thus, the defendants may have created a dangerous condition which caused the accident. The landlord failed to…

Meyers-Kraft v. Keem

The location of Plaintiff's fall is critical because third-party defendant was responsible only for clearing…