From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pass v. B.S.F. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 28, 1972
40 A.D.2d 813 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

November 28, 1972


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 18, 1972, denying defendants' motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Whether the claim here comes within the bar of the Statute of Frauds is a question of fact. If the block of stock for which plaintiff was allegedly commissioned to find a purchaser represented actual control, though not a numerical majority of the outstanding shares, this would be a "business opportunity." Whether or not a block of stock less than 50% of the issued stock does in any particular instance represent actual control is a question of fact. An issue being presented, the motion was properly denied.

Concur — Markewich, J.P., Kupferman, Murphy, McNally and Steuer, JJ.


Summaries of

Pass v. B.S.F. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 28, 1972
40 A.D.2d 813 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Pass v. B.S.F. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET E. PASS, as Administratrix of the Estate of SAM W. PASS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 28, 1972

Citations

40 A.D.2d 813 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

Ladder Capital Fin. v. 1250 N. S.D. Mezz, LLC

Because the loan agreement is ambiguous on this point, the court properly denied Hershman and Payne's motion…

In re Sloan

Rather, Stefurak would have to establish that the stock issue constituted a controlling interest in…