From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians v. Crosby

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jul 29, 2015
2:15-cv-00538-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2015)

Opinion

          STUART G. GROSS, DAN C. GOLDBERG, GROSS LAW, P.C., San Francisco, CA, JOSEPH R. SAVERI, ANDREW M. PURDY, KEVIN E. RAYHILL, JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM, INC., San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiffs the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians and the Paskenta Enterprises Corporation.

          GROSS LAW, P.C., Daniel C. Goldberg, Attorneys for Plaintiffs PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS and PASKENTA ENTERPRISES CORPORATION.

          LIBERTY LAW, A.P.C. John M. Murray, Attorneys for Defendants INES CROSBY, JOHN CROSBY, LESLIE LOHSE, LARRY LOHSE, TED PATA, JUAN PATA, CHRIS PATA, SHERRY MYERS, FRANK JAMES, THE PATRIOT GOLD & SILVER EXCHANGE, INC., and NORMAN R. RYAN.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED REDACTIONS TO DOCKET NO. 72-2

          GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.

         WHEREAS, on June 29, 2015, the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians and Paskenta Enterprises Corporation ("Plaintiffs") filed their Motion for a Preliminary Injunction ("Motion"), Dkt. No. 72, which seeks to freeze the assets of Defendants Ines Crosby, John Crosby, Leslie Lohse, and Larry Lohse ("Defendants");

         WHEREAS, due to an oversight by Plaintiffs, Dkt. No. 72-2, the Declaration of Brandin Paya in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion was filed with an attached Exhibit A which failed to redact certain private, identifying information of Defendants', including full social security numbers, home addresses, dates of birth, and driver's license numbers;

         WHEREAS, Civil Local Rule 140 requires the redaction of such identifying information;

         WHEREAS, all information filed with the Court is of public record;

         WHEREAS, the identifying information contained in Dkt. No. 72-2, Ex. A, may be readily accessed and used to perpetrate a criminal act;

         WHEREAS, the parties are in full agreement that the confidential identifying information should be prevented from public access;

         WHEREAS, the following redactions have been made to Dkt. No. 72-2, Ex. A, a copy of which is submitted herewith:

1. On page 2, Jon Pata's social security number and date of birth have been redacted;

2. On page 7, entitled "Currency Transaction Report, " Ines Crosby's home address, driver's license number, social security number, and date of birth have been redacted;

3. On page 8, Ines Crosby's driver's license number, home address, date of birth, social security number, and P.O. Box number have been redacted;

4. On page 9, Ines Crosby's home address and social security number have been redacted from her W-9 tax form;

5. On page 12, Ines Crosby's home address, driver's license number, social security number, and date of birth have been redacted; and

6. On page 19, the home addresses of each of the individuals listed have been redacted.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, pursuant to 5.2(a) and Civil Local Rules 140 and 143, and subject to approval by the Court, that:

1. The Clerk is instructed to remove Dkt. No. 72-2 from the case file; and

2. Plaintiffs may file the attached redacted copy of Dkt. No. 72-2.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED.

         PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians v. Crosby

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jul 29, 2015
2:15-cv-00538-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2015)
Case details for

Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians v. Crosby

Case Details

Full title:PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS; and PASKENTA ENTERPRISES CORPORATION…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 29, 2015

Citations

2:15-cv-00538-GEB-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2015)