From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paskel v. Higgins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 24, 1976
337 So. 2d 416 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. 75-2283.

September 24, 1976.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Brevard County, David U. Strawn, J.

A. Craig Cameron, Gosney, Haas, Cameron Parsons, Orlando, for appellants.

Sammy Cacciatore, Nance Cacciatore, Melbourne, for appellees.


The defendant-dog owner appeals from a partial summary judgment on the issue of liability entered against him in a dog-bite case brought under the provisions of Fla. Stat., Sec. 767.04. While, on the authority of Sand v. Gold, 301 So.2d 828 (3 DCA Fla. 1974), cert. den., 312 So.2d 752 (Fla. 1975), we hold that the 6-year-old plaintiff was conclusively shown not to have "mischievously . . . provoke[d] or aggravate[d] . . ." the dog in question, we have concluded that plaintiffs-appellees did not meet this burden, of course necessary to sustain a summary judgment, to establish that the child was on the defendants' premises, where the bite occurred, ". . . upon invitation, expressed or implied, of the owner thereof. . . ." Since recovery under Fla. Stat., Sec. 767.04 requires such a showing, we reverse for a trial on this liability issue and, if appropriate, on that of damages.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part, with directions.

DOWNEY, J., and MORROW, RUSSELL O., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Paskel v. Higgins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Sep 24, 1976
337 So. 2d 416 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Paskel v. Higgins

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT PASKEL ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. SHARON I. HIGGINS, ETC., APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Sep 24, 1976

Citations

337 So. 2d 416 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

Porter v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Additionally, two cases from the Fourth DCA have implicitly applied this defense to small children. In both…