From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parson v. Keith

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jun 24, 2008
Case No. CIV-07-994-M (W.D. Okla. Jun. 24, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-07-994-M.

June 24, 2008


ORDER


On April 23, 2008, United States Magistrate Judge Valerie K. Couch issued a Report and Recommendation in this action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, seeking a writ of habeas corpus. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. The parties were advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation by May 13, 2008. On May 13, 2008, petitioner filed his objection, in which he contends the Magistrate Judge erred in her rulings regarding grounds one, two, four, five, six, and eight of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Having carefully reviewed this matter denovo, the Court finds, for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, that petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus should be denied.

Accordingly, the Court:

(1) ADOPTS the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 23, 2008;
(2) DENIES the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; and
(3) ORDERS that judgment in favor of respondent issue forthwith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Parson v. Keith

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jun 24, 2008
Case No. CIV-07-994-M (W.D. Okla. Jun. 24, 2008)
Case details for

Parson v. Keith

Case Details

Full title:RANDY DALE PARSON, Petitioner, v. JIM KEITH, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 24, 2008

Citations

Case No. CIV-07-994-M (W.D. Okla. Jun. 24, 2008)

Citing Cases

Lester v. New Mexico Department of Corrections

Moreover, "Tenth Circuit precedent generally holds that no Brady violation occurs if evidence is disclosed…