Summary
In Davis v. Leopold (87 N.Y. 622) the fraudulent grantee assumed the payment of a pre-existing mortgage, and on review of the judgment setting aside the deed, this court said, "if it was true under the findings that Mrs. Leopold was entitled to protection for the sum paid or the liability assumed, it would, indeed, be necessary to state the amount.
Summary of this case from H.N. Bank et al. v. HalstedOpinion
Argued October 24, 1881
Decided November 22, 1881
Albert Stickney for appellant.
William G. Wilson for respondent.
Per Curiam opinion for affirmance of order and for judgment absolute on stipulation.
All concur.
Order affirmed and judgment accordingly.