From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parrish v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Feb 3, 2014
CIVIL NO. 3:13cv46-JRS (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2014)

Summary

remanding where ALJ mistakenly concluded that physician did not provide treatment to claimant during the relevant period; "[o]ther courts reviewing similar errors by ALJ's regarding treating physicians have also refused to find such errors to be harmless"

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Colvin

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 3:13cv46-JRS

02-03-2014

VICKY FAYE PARRISH, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


FINAL ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (R&R) entered on January 8, 2014 (ECF No. 19). The time to file objections has expired and neither party has objected to the R&R. Having considered the matter and deeming it otherwise proper and just to do so, it is hereby ORDERED:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 19) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.
(2) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 14) is DENIED.
(3) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED.
(4) The final decision of the Commissioner is VACATED and REMANDED to the ALJ to reweigh the evidence to determine whether Plaintiff was disabled for Disability Insurance Benefits purposes, as explained in the R&R.
(5) This case is CLOSED.

Let the Clerk of the Court send a copy of this Final Order to Plaintiff and all counsel of record.

It is so ORDERED. Richmond, Virginia
Date: 2/3/14

__________

James R. Spencer

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Parrish v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Feb 3, 2014
CIVIL NO. 3:13cv46-JRS (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2014)

remanding where ALJ mistakenly concluded that physician did not provide treatment to claimant during the relevant period; "[o]ther courts reviewing similar errors by ALJ's regarding treating physicians have also refused to find such errors to be harmless"

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Colvin

explaining that the Fourth Circuit has yet to address the application of the harmless error rule in the social security disability context in a published opinion, but has applied the rule in two unpublished opinions reviewing appeals denying Social Security benefits

Summary of this case from Newhart v. Colvin
Case details for

Parrish v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:VICKY FAYE PARRISH, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Feb 3, 2014

Citations

CIVIL NO. 3:13cv46-JRS (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2014)

Citing Cases

Newhart v. Colvin

(ECF 11 at 2-7; ECF 12 at 15-18; ECF 15.) The Court observes that to the extent such standard applies here,…

Johnson v. Colvin

relationship with Johnson. See Lopez v. Colvin, 2014 WL 5410299, *15 (D.R.I. 2014) ("[w]hen an opinion is…