From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equip., Inc.

Court of Appeals of New York.
Nov 15, 2011
958 N.E.2d 119 (N.Y. 2011)

Opinion

2011-11-15

In the Matter of Bob PARKHURST, Claimant, v. UNITED RENTALS AERIAL EQUIPMENT, INC., et al., Appellants.Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.In the Matter of James Arthur Robinson, Claimant, v. Gould Pumps ITT et al., Appellants.Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.

Buckner & Kourofsky, LLP, Rochester (Jacklyn M. Penna of counsel), for appellants. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Steven C. Wu, Barbara D. Underwood and Benjamin N. Gutman of counsel), for respondent.


Buckner & Kourofsky, LLP, Rochester (Jacklyn M. Penna of counsel), for appellants. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Steven C. Wu, Barbara D. Underwood and Benjamin N. Gutman of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs ( see Matter of Raynor v. Landmark Chrysler, 18 N.Y.3d 48, ––– N.Y.S.2d ––––, ––– N.E.2d –––– [decided today] ).

Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur. Chief Judge LIPPMAN took no part.


Summaries of

Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equip., Inc.

Court of Appeals of New York.
Nov 15, 2011
958 N.E.2d 119 (N.Y. 2011)
Case details for

Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equip., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Bob PARKHURST, Claimant, v. UNITED RENTALS AERIAL…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Nov 15, 2011

Citations

958 N.E.2d 119 (N.Y. 2011)
958 N.E.2d 119
934 N.Y.S.2d 85
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8182

Citing Cases

Marku v. Abm Indus.

The ATF's application for reconsideration and/or full Board review was denied, and the ATF now appeals from…

Marku v. ABM Indus.

The ATF's application for reconsideration and/or full Board review was denied, and the ATF now appeals from…