affirming district court judgment that "Title III only covers discrimination in the physical access to goods and services, not discrimination in the terms of insurance policies"
Summary of this case from Doe v. Bluecross Blueshield of Tenn., Inc.No. 97-747.
January 20, 1998, October TERM, 1997.
C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 121 F. 3d 1006.
affirming district court judgment that "Title III only covers discrimination in the physical access to goods and services, not discrimination in the terms of insurance policies"
Summary of this case from Doe v. Bluecross Blueshield of Tenn., Inc.Full title:PARKER v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. et al
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 20, 1998
In 1995, for example, Mississippi transformed its student admissions policies from the standardized…
WAI v. ALLSTATE INS. CO.t Cir. 1994) (holding that Title III was not limited solely to goods and services obtained…