From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker v. Harrisburg City

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 14, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-653 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 14, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-653

07-14-2017

CARNEAL PARKER, Plaintiff v. HARRISBURG CITY, et al., Defendants


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 14th day of July, 2017, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 9) of Chief Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab, recommending the court dismiss the complaint (Doc. 1) of pro se plaintiff Carneal Parker ("Parker") for failure to pay the filing fee or to file a proper application to proceed in forma pauperis after the court placed Parker on notice that failure to do so would result in dismissal of this action, (see Doc. 6), and it appearing that Parker has not objected to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and the court noting that failure of a party to timely object to a magistrate judge's conclusions "may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level," Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987)), but that, as a matter of good practice, a district court should "afford some level of review to dispositive legal issues raised by the report," Henderson, 812 F.2d t 878; see also Taylor v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 83 F. Supp. 3d 625, 626 (M.D. Pa. 2015) (citing Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Int'l, Inc., 702 F. Supp. 2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010)), in order to "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes, and, following independent review of the record, the court being in full agreement with Judge Schwab's recommendation, and concluding that there is no clear error on the face of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 9) of Chief Magistrate Judge Schwab is ADOPTED.

2. Parker's complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned action.

4. Any appeal from this order is deemed to be frivolous and not taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Parker v. Harrisburg City

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 14, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-653 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 14, 2017)
Case details for

Parker v. Harrisburg City

Case Details

Full title:CARNEAL PARKER, Plaintiff v. HARRISBURG CITY, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jul 14, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-653 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 14, 2017)