From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker v. Buckley Madole, P.C.

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Apr 4, 2018
Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-307 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 4, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-307

04-04-2018

KENDALL PARKER, ET AL. v. BUCKLEY MADOLE, P.C., ET AL.


(Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the reports of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On January 5, 2018, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #66) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Buckley Madole, P.C.'s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #56) be granted. On January 8, 2018, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #67) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Locke Lord, L.L.P.'s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #53) be granted. On January 11, 2018, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #68) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #55) be granted.

Having received the reports of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's reports as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant Buckley Madole, P.C.'s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #56), Defendant Locke Lord, L.L.P.'s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #53), and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #55) are GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' claims against Defendants Buckley Madole, P.C., Locke Lord, L.L.P., and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. are DISMISSED.

All relief not previously granted is DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 4th day of April, 2018.

/s/_________

AMOS L. MAZZANT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Parker v. Buckley Madole, P.C.

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Apr 4, 2018
Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-307 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 4, 2018)
Case details for

Parker v. Buckley Madole, P.C.

Case Details

Full title:KENDALL PARKER, ET AL. v. BUCKLEY MADOLE, P.C., ET AL.

Court:United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 4, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-307 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 4, 2018)

Citing Cases

Silverman v. Clairemont H.A., Inc.

Thus, she did not establish as a matter of law that the Association's attorney was a collection agent subject…

Dexon Comput. v. Cisco Sys.

” Parker v. Buckley Madole, P.C., No. 4:17-CV-00307-ALM-CAN, 2018 WL 1704079, at *4 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 11,…