From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parker Brothers v. Tuxedo Monopoly, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Mar 1, 1985
757 F.2d 254 (Fed. Cir. 1985)

Opinion

Appeal No. 84-1499.

March 1, 1985.

Oliver P. Howes, Jr., Nims, Howes, Collison Isner, New York City, for appellant.

Virginia R. Richard, Kane, Dalsimer, Kane, Sullivan Kurucz, New York City, for appellee.

Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, RICH, Circuit Judge, and COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge.


ORDER


Parker Brothers appeals from denial by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Board) of its motion for summary judgment.

Tuxedo Monopoly, Inc. (TUXEDO) asks this court to reverse the Board's denial of its motion for summary judgment and to order cancellation of Parker's registrations. Tuxedo filed no appeal, and its requests are therefore improper.

As is its duty, the court raises sua sponte the question of its jurisdiction to hear this appeal. Mansfield, C L M.R.R. Co. v. Swan, 111 U.S. 379, 382, 4 S.Ct. 510, 511, 28 L.Ed. 462 (1884); Wagner Shokai, Inc. v. Kabushiki Kaisha Wako, 699 F.2d 1390, 1391, 217 USPQ 98 (Fed. Cir. 1983). See generally 5 WRIGHT MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE §§ 1350, 1393.

An order denying a motion for summary judgment is interlocutory, non-final, and non-appealable. 28 U.S.C. § 1291, 1292. That rule is applicable to orders entered by the Board. R. G. Barry Corp. v. Mushroom Makers, Inc., 609 F.2d 1002, 204 USPQ 195 (CCPA 1979); see also Wagner Shokai, 699 F.2d at 1391, 217 USPQ at 98. See generally 6 J. Moore J. Wicker, MOORE'S FEDERAL PRACTICE ¶ 56.21[2] (2d ed. 1982).

It is therefore ORDERED

1) that the appeal be dismissed.


Summaries of

Parker Brothers v. Tuxedo Monopoly, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Mar 1, 1985
757 F.2d 254 (Fed. Cir. 1985)
Case details for

Parker Brothers v. Tuxedo Monopoly, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PARKER BROTHERS, APPELLANT, v. TUXEDO MONOPOLY, INC., APPELLEE

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 1, 1985

Citations

757 F.2d 254 (Fed. Cir. 1985)

Citing Cases

Vosk Int'l Co. v. Zao Gruppa Predpriyatij Ost

"An order denying a motion for summary judgment is interlocutory, non-final, and non-appealable." Parker…

Stevenson v. Charter

"An order denying a motion for summary judgment is interlocutory, non-final, and non-appealable." Parker…