From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parkash v. N.Y. City Water Bd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 11, 2008
57 A.D.3d 290 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4792.

December 11, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered January 25, 2007, which denied petitioner's application to annul respondent Water Board's determination calculating petitioner's wastewater charge based on 159% of petitioner's water charge, including a surcharge for having failed to timely install a water meter, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Goldberg Bokor, LLP, Long Beach (Scott Goldberg of counsel), for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Julian L. Kalkstein of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny, Catterson and Moskowitz, JJ.


Respondent's determination was neither arbitrary, capricious, nor a violation of law ( see Haav 575 Realty Corp. v New York City Water Bd., 38 AD3d 481). To the extent that the decision of the Appellate Division, Second Department, in Matter of Pistilli Assoc. Ill, LLC v New York City Water Bd. ( 46 AD3d 905) calls for a different result, we disagree.


Summaries of

Parkash v. N.Y. City Water Bd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 11, 2008
57 A.D.3d 290 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Parkash v. N.Y. City Water Bd.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of VED PARKASH, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY WATER BOARD et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 11, 2008

Citations

57 A.D.3d 290 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 9711
868 N.Y.S.2d 527

Citing Cases

Matter of Parkash v. New York City Water Bd.

Decided April 7, 2009. Appeal from the 1st Dept: 57 AD3d 290. Motions for Leave to Appeal…