From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Parham v. Hellebush

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 16, 1942
263 App. Div. 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

February 16, 1942.


Action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of defendants. Order denying plaintiff's motion for examination of defendants before trial modified on the law and the facts by striking out everything following the words "hereby is" and inserting in place thereof the following: "granted as to items 3 and 4, and in other respects denied." As so modified, the order, in so far as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. Defendants being willing to admit operation and control, plaintiff withdraws items 1 and 2; and defendants being willing to furnish a copy of the release, examination as to items 5 and 6 is unnecessary. It was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny the examination as to items 3 and 4. ( Ehrlich v. New York Central R.R. Co., 251 App. Div. 721; Foley v. Long Island R.R. Co., 242 id. 780.) The examination is to take place in Westchester county. Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Parham v. Hellebush

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 16, 1942
263 App. Div. 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Parham v. Hellebush

Case Details

Full title:MARION A. PARHAM, Appellant, v. CHARLES K. HELLEBUSH, JR., and BLAIR A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 16, 1942

Citations

263 App. Div. 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Citing Cases

Dunn v. Evening Star Newspaper Company

Because of the inherent discretion vested in the trial judge in ruling on objections to interrogatories, his…