From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pargas, Inc. v. Empire Gas Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 14, 1976
546 F.2d 25 (4th Cir. 1976)

Opinion

No. 76-1624.

Argued June 11, 1976.

Decided June 14, 1976.

George Beall, Baltimore, Md., and Robert W. Sweet, New York City (Miles Stockbridge, Baltimore, Md., and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher Flom, New York City, on brief), for appellants.

James V. Dolan and David L. Roll, Washington, D.C. (Calvin H. Cobb, Jr., Steptoe Johnson, Washington, D.C., Joseph H. H. Kaplan, J. Frederick Motz, Venable, Baetjer Howard, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland., at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, District Judge, 423 F. Supp. 199.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, WINTER, and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.


Upon consideration of the record and briefs and after hearing argument, we are satisfied that the factual findings of the district court are not erroneous, that the district court correctly applied the law, and that it committed no abuse of discretion in formulating and issuing a preliminary injunction.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Pargas, Inc. v. Empire Gas Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 14, 1976
546 F.2d 25 (4th Cir. 1976)
Case details for

Pargas, Inc. v. Empire Gas Corp.

Case Details

Full title:PARGAS, INC., A MARYLAND CORPORATION, APPELLEE v. EMPIRE GAS CORP., A…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 14, 1976

Citations

546 F.2d 25 (4th Cir. 1976)

Citing Cases

West Point-Pepperell, Inc. v. Farley Inc.

Despite West Point's lack of standing to directly assert a margin violation, West Point clearly has standing…

United States v. United Technologies Corp.

United States v. Culbro Corp., supra, 436 F. Supp. at 754-56. However, if there is a probability that…