From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paone v. Tryon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1985
112 A.D.2d 149 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

July 1, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Vitale, J.).


Order affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs commenced this action by service of a summons and complaint upon defendant Dewey Tryon on or about March 4, 1983. The complaint alleges that a motor vehicle accident took place on January 9, 1981, due to defendant Dewey Tryon's negligent operation of an automobile owned by the State of New York which forced plaintiff Paone to swerve into the opposite lane of traffic and strike a vehicle stopped for a light at an intersection.

Public Officers Law § 17 merely creates a cause of action on behalf of a State employee or officer against the State for indemnification for financial loss sustained by virtue of such employee's or officer's negligence while acting within the scope of his employment ( see, Ott v. Barash, 109 A.D.2d 254; De Vivo v Grosjean, 48 A.D.2d 158). Under that statute the State does not become the real party in interest as there is no assumption of direct liability for the employee's negligent acts ( Ott v Barash, supra; Olmstead v. Britton, 48 A.D.2d 536).

Since plaintiffs have the right to sue a State employee in the Supreme Court and the State is not the real party in interest based upon its duty to indemnify under the Public Officers Law, the applicable Statute of Limitations is three years as provided in CPLR 214. Therefore plaintiffs' action was timely commenced as against defendant Dewey Tryon. Lazer, J.P., Gibbons, Thompson and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Paone v. Tryon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1985
112 A.D.2d 149 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Paone v. Tryon

Case Details

Full title:FRANK PAONE et al., Respondents, v. DEWEY TRYON, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 149 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Schettino v. Alter

Thus, plaintiff does not seek any relief in the form of declarations or injunctions or otherwise against the…

People v. Insalaco

Section 17 has been construed as creating a cause of action on behalf of State employees against the State…