From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Panico v. Accurate Fence Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 15, 1995
215 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

May 15, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The intentional act of the third-party defendant Weems in assaulting the plaintiffs with a fence post constituted a superseding cause of the plaintiffs' injuries. Any alleged negligence of the defendant third-party plaintiff Accurate Fence Corporation (hereinafter Accurate) in failing to remove the old fence debris was so attenuated from the plaintiffs' ultimate injuries that the imposition of liability on Accurate and the New York City Housing Authority would be unreasonable (see, Asaro v Laponte, 198 A.D.2d 202; Elardo v Town of Oyster Bay, 176 A.D.2d 912; O'Britis v Peninsula Golf Course, 143 A.D.2d 123). Thompson, J.P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Panico v. Accurate Fence Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 15, 1995
215 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Panico v. Accurate Fence Corporation

Case Details

Full title:DOMENICO PANICO et al., Appellants, v. ACCURATE FENCE CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 15, 1995

Citations

215 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
626 N.Y.S.2d 281

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. Edward Judge

uisite control over Edward's conduct so as to give rise to a duty to control his conduct for the protection…