Summary
holding that a thirty-one day delay failed to satisfy the policy condition
Summary of this case from DeGeorge v. Ace American Insurance CompanyOpinion
December 1, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly S. Cohen, J.).
The IAS Court correctly held that plaintiff cannot recover on its policy with defendant because of its failure to notify defendant of the loss as soon as practicable (see, Heydt Constr. Corp. v American Home Assur. Co., 146 A.D.2d 497, lv dismissed 74 N.Y.2d 651). Plaintiff's good faith belief that the loss was not covered does not excuse the late notice, which was not received until 31 days after the initial loss and after the offending elbow pipe had been replaced and the damaged stock removed.
Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Ross, Asch and Kassal, JJ.