From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palumbo v. Indus. Comm

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 18, 1941
35 N.E.2d 446 (Ohio 1941)

Opinion

No. 28665

Decided June 18, 1941.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Garnishment — Industrial Commission employee's salary held subject to garnishee process — In proceeding in aid against Industrial Commission, Treasurer and Auditor of State — "Body politic" — Section 11760, General Code — Section 16, Article I, and Section 4, Article VIII, Constitution.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Franklin county.

Mr. Maurice K. Topson, for appellee.

Mr. Thomas J. Herbert, attorney general, Mr. E.G. Schuessler and Mr. David M. Spriggs, for appellants.



It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., TURNER, WILLIAMS, HART, ZIMMERMAN and BETTMAN, JJ., concur.

MATTHIAS, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Palumbo v. Indus. Comm

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 18, 1941
35 N.E.2d 446 (Ohio 1941)
Case details for

Palumbo v. Indus. Comm

Case Details

Full title:PALUMBO, APPELLEE v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLANTS

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 18, 1941

Citations

35 N.E.2d 446 (Ohio 1941)
35 N.E.2d 446

Citing Cases

Bank One, Cleveland, N.A. v. Lincoln Electric

The mere filing of a creditor's bill secures a lien on the assets of defendant which are enumerated in R.C.…