From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palmer v. Brown

Supreme Court of the State of California
Mar 1, 1850
1 Cal. 42 (Cal. 1850)

Opinion

03-01-1850

PALMER v. BROWN.

John Satterlee, for the Plaintiff. J. B. Hart, for the Defendant.


APPEAL from a judgment of the Court of First Instance of the District of San Francisco. The facts of the case, so far as they are important, are the same as the facts in the case of Gonzales v. Huntley, (ante, p. 32). The cause was argued in this Court by John Satterlee, for the Plaintiff. J. B. Hart, for the Defendant.

By the Court. This case is not distinguishable from Gonzales v. Huntley & Forsythe. The judgment is therefore affirmed.


Summaries of

Palmer v. Brown

Supreme Court of the State of California
Mar 1, 1850
1 Cal. 42 (Cal. 1850)
Case details for

Palmer v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:PALMER v. BROWN.

Court:Supreme Court of the State of California

Date published: Mar 1, 1850

Citations

1 Cal. 42 (Cal. 1850)

Citing Cases

McManus v. Patch

We think no further discussion is demanded as the legal principles involved are elementary and well settled.…