From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palm v. Palm

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Apr 7, 2017
214 So. 3d 792 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 5D16–2368

04-07-2017

Charles L. PALM, Appellant, v. Ashley PALM n/k/a Ashley Plonk, Appellee.

Charles L. Palm, Moore Haven, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.


Charles L. Palm, Moore Haven, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Charles L. Palm appeals the trial court's denial of his petition to dissolve a final judgment of injunction for protection against domestic violence. Palm argues that the trial court erred in summarily denying the petition and that the trial court should have held a hearing. We agree. See Reed v. Reed , 816 So.2d 1246, 1247 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) ; Baker v. Pucket , 139 So.3d 954, 955–56 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) ; Carrozza v. Stowers , 153 So.3d 340, 341 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). Thus, we reverse the order under review and remand with instructions for the trial court to hold a hearing on Palm's petition.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., SAWAYA and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Palm v. Palm

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Apr 7, 2017
214 So. 3d 792 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Palm v. Palm

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES L. PALM, Appellant, v. ASHLEY PALM N/K/A ASHLEY PLONK, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 7, 2017

Citations

214 So. 3d 792 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)