Opinion
August 16, 1999.
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.).
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, the motion to terminate child support is granted to the extent of terminating such obligation as of November 17, 1997, that branch of the cross motion which was for leave to enter a money judgment in the amount of $44,291 for child support arrears through April 6, 1998, is denied, the order entered February 13, 1998, is vacated, and the matter is remitted for a hearing to determine the amount, if any, of child support arrears in accordance herewith.
By order dated June 6, 1996, the Supreme Court, inter alia, directed the plaintiff to pay the defendant $1,500 per month in temporary child support for the parties' son, who was then in the defendant's custody. By order to show cause dated November 17, 1997, the plaintiff moved to terminate his child support obligation retroactive to May 30, 1997, by which date the child had allegedly been removed from the defendant's custody based on allegations of neglect. By order dated February 13, 1998, the Supreme Court denied the motion because there was "no proof submitted, beyond the hearsay statements of the plaintiff and his attorney [that] there has been a change in custody".
Thereafter, the plaintiff moved for leave to reargue and/or renew his prior motion and he submitted an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Staton, J.), dated June 4, 1997, temporarily transferring custody of the child from the defendant to the Commissioner of Social Services. The plaintiff averred that he had been unable to obtain the order in time to submit it in support of his initial motion. The plaintiff also submitted another order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated April 27, 1998, which temporarily transferred custody of the child to him.
On the facts presented, termination of the plaintiff's temporary child support obligation is appropriate ( see, Verderame v. Verderame, 247 A.D.2d 609; Lloyd v. McGrath, 246 A.D.2d 630; Beige v. Beige, 220 A.D.2d 636). However, the obligation may only be terminated as of November 17, 1997, the date the plaintiff sought such relief ( see, Matter of Dox v. Tynon, 90 N.Y.2d 166; Domestic Relations Law § 236[B] [9] [b]). In light of this and the plaintiff's challenge to the accuracy of the amount of arrears claimed by the defendant, the matter is remitted for a hearing to determine the amount, if any, of child support arrears ( see, Boris v. Boris, 245 A.D.2d 409).
Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Joy and H. Miller, JJ., concur.