From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Paliotto v. Hartman

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County
Jun 27, 1957
9 Misc. 2d 963 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1957)

Opinion

June 27, 1957

Friedman, Brenner Friedman for Sylvester Cosentino, defendant.

Angelo J. Paliotto, plaintiff in person.


Motion to dismiss the second cause of action against Sylvester Cosentino upon the ground that said action was barred by the Statute of Limitations. Inasmuch as the moving defendant under the second cause of action is an alleged conspirator with the other defendants to accomplish the wrong charged in the first cause of action ( Green v. Davies, 83 App. Div. 216) he is united in interest with his coconspirators within the meaning of section 16 of the Civil Practice Act. His motion to dismiss the second cause of action as not having been commenced against him within the time limited by law is denied.

Submit order on notice.


Summaries of

Paliotto v. Hartman

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County
Jun 27, 1957
9 Misc. 2d 963 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1957)
Case details for

Paliotto v. Hartman

Case Details

Full title:ANGELO J. PALIOTTO, Plaintiff, v. SYLVIA HARTMAN et al., Defendants

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County

Date published: Jun 27, 1957

Citations

9 Misc. 2d 963 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1957)
174 N.Y.S.2d 328

Citing Cases

Gross v. Newburger, Loeb

In this case, plaintiffs' second cause of action on behalf of plaintiff Gross alleges, in pertinent part,…