From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Palansky v. Reich

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 27, 1933
168 A. 297 (N.J. 1933)

Opinion

Argued May 24, 1933 —

Decided September 27, 1933.

On appeal from the Supreme Court.

For the appellant, Walter V. Schwartz.

For the respondents, Chandless, Weller Selser.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court, and printed in 11 N.J. Mis. R. 106.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Palansky v. Reich

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 27, 1933
168 A. 297 (N.J. 1933)
Case details for

Palansky v. Reich

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM PALANSKY, APPELLANT, v. MAX REICH ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 27, 1933

Citations

168 A. 297 (N.J. 1933)
168 A. 297

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Powell-Savory Corp.

Prosecutor relies solely upon R.S. 2:32-121, which provides that, in the District Court, "An application for…

Garfield v. Feier

By R.S. 54:5-54, redemption may be made only by a person having an interest in the property and upon the…