From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

P.A.K. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 3, 1991
582 So. 2d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 89-02234.

July 3, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Carl C. Durrance (Retired) and Vincent E. Giglio, JJ.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and John S. Lynch, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joseph R. Bryant, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We reverse the adjudication of delinquency of defendant, a juvenile, based upon a finding that she committed criminal mischief involving damage to a coke machine. The evidence was that three persons, including defendant, were present when a coke machine fell over. One of them said, "Let's get money out." Thereafter, the defendant and another girl were seen running away. We conclude that the state's evidence against defendant was insufficient. The evidence did not establish why the machine fell over; if it was pushed, by whom; or that it was damaged.

Reversed. Defendant shall be discharged.

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

P.A.K. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 3, 1991
582 So. 2d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

P.A.K. v. State

Case Details

Full title:P.A.K., A CHILD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 3, 1991

Citations

582 So. 2d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)