From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pagan v. Penthouse Manufacturing Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 1986
121 A.D.2d 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

June 2, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Molloy, J.).


Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant's argument, the plaintiffs' motion which was, in effect, a motion to "`vacate or modify [a] precalendar conference order'", was procedurally proper (see, Cohalan v. Johnson Elec. Constr. Corp., 105 A.D.2d 770). Moreover, the resulting order of Special Term did not constitute an abuse of discretion (see, Everitt v. Health Maintenance Center, 86 A.D.2d 224, 227). Mangano, J.P., Gibbons, Niehoff and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pagan v. Penthouse Manufacturing Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 2, 1986
121 A.D.2d 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Pagan v. Penthouse Manufacturing Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RAFAEL PAGAN et al., Respondents, v. PENTHOUSE MANUFACTURING Co., INC., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 2, 1986

Citations

121 A.D.2d 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Tangalin v. MTA Long Island Bus

We agree with the appellants' contention that the Supreme Court erroneously treated their motion to vacate so…

Mega Const. v. Benson Park Assoc

We agree with the defendant's contention that the Supreme Court erroneously treated its cross motion, inter…