From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Padula v. Richfield Oil Corporation of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

March, 1935.

Appeal from Schenectady County, Supreme Court.


The action is for damages for breach of contract for the alleged sale of gasoline by defendant to plaintiff. The defendant moved for a bill of particulars, demanding in substance the following: 1. Whether the agreement in question was oral or written, and a copy thereof. 2. The number of gallons purchased from the defendant by the plaintiff and the date and quantity of each purchase. 3. The manner in which defendant has neglected and refused to deliver. 4. The facts and date as to each breach. 5. Who on behalf of the defendant breached the alleged contract and the date and manner thereof. 6. The manner in which plaintiff computes the alleged damages and a detailed itemized list of such computations. 7. The date of each demand, whether oral or not, to whom on behalf of the defendant such demand was made. The Special Term granted defendant's request as to the second item above specified and denied the demand for the other items. Order in so far as appealed from reversed on the law and facts and motion granted, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant against the respondent. Hill, P.J., Rhodes, McNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Padula v. Richfield Oil Corporation of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Padula v. Richfield Oil Corporation of New York

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH A. PADULA, Respondent, v. RICHFIELD OIL CORPORATION OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1935

Citations

243 App. Div. 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

Greco v. Romanelli

Under the circumstances appearing in the record before us, defendants' loss of profits constitutes special…

Ferreri v. Dworman Assoc

But, here, the moving party is requesting a particularization of the damaged items and the cost of repairing…