From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Packel v. Tolleson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 7, 1975
340 A.2d 428 (Pa. 1975)

Opinion

Argued May 22, 1974.

Decided July 7, 1975.

Appeal from the Commonwealth Court, No. 207, C.D. 1973.

Robert P. Kane, Atty. Gen., Joel Weisberg, George M. Kashi, Dept. Attys. Gen., Harrisburg, Bureau of Consumer Protection, for appellant.

James H. Joseph, Pittsburgh, for appellee.

Before JONES, C. J., and EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY and NIX, JJ.


OPINION OF THE COURT


After a full counseled hearing before the Commonwealth Court, an order was entered restraining and enjoining the appellees, James and Rodney Tolleson, from certain violations of the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law. The order afforded the parties twenty days within which to file exceptions before becoming final. Since no exceptions were taken, the order became final and no issues were properly preserved for appeal. Pa.R.C.P. 1518, 12 P.S. Appendix. See also Turnway Corporation v. Soffer, 461 Pa. 447, 336 A.2d 871 (Filed April 25, 1975); Rothermel Estate, 461 Pa. 1, 334 A.2d 603 (Filed March 18, 1975); Banes Estate, 461 Pa. 203, 336 A.2d 248 (Filed March 18, 1975); Logan v. Cherrie, 444 Pa. 555, 282 A.2d 236 (1971). Cf. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co., 457 Pa. 255, 322 A.2d 114 (1974).

Decree affirmed. Each party to pay own costs.

MANDERINO, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

EAGEN, J., concurs in the result.


Summaries of

Packel v. Tolleson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 7, 1975
340 A.2d 428 (Pa. 1975)
Case details for

Packel v. Tolleson

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Acting by Attorney General Israel PACKEL…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 7, 1975

Citations

340 A.2d 428 (Pa. 1975)
340 A.2d 428

Citing Cases

Schnabel Assoc. v. Bldg. Const. Trades

Pa.R.Civ.P. 1519(a) provides that, if no exceptions are filed within the ten-day period, then the decree nisi…

P.L.R.B. v. Local 668

By analogy, appeals from courts of record will not be entertained unless exceptions are filed with the trial…