Opinion
Submitted October 25, 1946 —
Decided January 17, 1947.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported at 134 N.J.L. 149.
For the appellant, Laurence Semel.
For the respondent, James J. Carroll.
The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, DONGES, COLIE, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, WELLS, RAFFERTY, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN, JJ. 12.
For modification — HEHER, McGEEHAN, JJ. 2.