From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pacheco v. Pacheco

Supreme Court of New Mexico
Apr 26, 1971
484 P.2d 328 (N.M. 1971)

Opinion

No. 9156.

April 26, 1971.

Appeal from the District Court, Los Alamos County, J. M. Scarborough, D. J.

Branch Dickson, Albuquerque, for defendant-appellant.

Abner Schreiber, Los Alamos, for plaintiff-appellee.


OPINION


This is an appeal of an order entered by the District Court of Los Alamos County, New Mexico. After hearing on an order to show cause, the defendant Pacheco was found in contempt of court for failure to pay child support. Judgment was entered against Pacheco for $16,000 for arrearage of child support. The sentence on contempt was held in abeyance for a period of thirty days to allow Pacheco to purge himself of the contempt. This he did not do but immediately appealed.

There being no final order entered in this case by the trial court, this court is without jurisdiction in the matter.

While the jurisdictional question was not raised by either party, an appellate court will and should, on its own motion, raise lack of jurisdiction where an order lacks finality due to an absence of the necessary determination and order of the trial court. Aetna Casualty Surety Company v. Miles, 80 N.M. 237, 453 P.2d 757 (1969).

The appeal is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

OMAN and STEPHENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pacheco v. Pacheco

Supreme Court of New Mexico
Apr 26, 1971
484 P.2d 328 (N.M. 1971)
Case details for

Pacheco v. Pacheco

Case Details

Full title:Myrtle E. PACHECO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis PACHECO, Defendant-Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of New Mexico

Date published: Apr 26, 1971

Citations

484 P.2d 328 (N.M. 1971)
82 N.M. 486

Citing Cases

Watson v. Blakely

However, since this issue affects the finality of judgment, this court must consider the matter on its own…

Quintana v. Quintana

This Court further holds as it has in the past on its own motion that it is without jurisdiction in the…