From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

P2E Holdings, LLC v. Trinity Petroleum Mgmt.

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Mar 6, 2023
Civil Action 4:22-CV-03002 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 6, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:22-CV-03002

03-06-2023

P2ES HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff. v. TRINITY PETROLEUM MANAGEMENT, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

GEORGE C.HANKS,JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On January 11, 2023, P2ES Holdings, LLC's Motion to Remand (Dkt. 15) was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). See Dkt. 24. Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation on February 13, 2023, recommending that P2ES Holdings, LLC's Motion to Remand (Dkt. 15) be DENIED. See Dkt. 26.

No objections have been filed to the Memorandum and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Memorandum and Recommendation for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).

Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:

(1) Judge Edison's Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 26) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; and

(2) P2ES Holdings, LLC's Motion to Remand (Dkt. 15) is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED and ENTERED this 6th day of March 2023.


Summaries of

P2E Holdings, LLC v. Trinity Petroleum Mgmt.

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Mar 6, 2023
Civil Action 4:22-CV-03002 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 6, 2023)
Case details for

P2E Holdings, LLC v. Trinity Petroleum Mgmt.

Case Details

Full title:P2ES HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff. v. TRINITY PETROLEUM MANAGEMENT, LLC…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Mar 6, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 4:22-CV-03002 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 6, 2023)

Citing Cases

McDonald v. Grimsley

In support of Defendants' argument, they cite in both their amended notice of removal and their response to…