From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Owens v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 2, 1918
78 So. 423 (Ala. Crim. App. 1918)

Opinion

8 Div. 537.

April 2, 1918.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; W.W. Haralson, Judge.

Robert Owens was indicted in two counts; the first charging the forgery of a check, and the second charging the uttering of the check. Defendant was convicted under the second count, and appeals. Reversed and remanded.

Milo Moody, of Scottsboro, for appellant. F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., for the State.


Before a defendant can be convicted of uttering a forged instrument, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there was a forged instrument, and that the defendant, knowing the instrument to be forged, with the intent to defraud, uttered it. The check in evidence purported to have been signed by Raymond Bradford, and was made payable to the order of Tom Jones, for $5.06. Bradford testified:

"I had these checks made myself; that is, just exactly like the check I used. * * * I never issued a check of that character to this man. * * * I did not issue the check."

This was all the evidence tending to prove the forgery. All of this may have been true, and yet no forgery have occurred. There is nothing in the evidence to show that Bradford did not authorize the signing of the check.

From the facts as disclosed by the bill of exceptions, the court erred in refusing to give the general charge as requested by the defendant.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Owens v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 2, 1918
78 So. 423 (Ala. Crim. App. 1918)
Case details for

Owens v. State

Case Details

Full title:OWENS v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 2, 1918

Citations

78 So. 423 (Ala. Crim. App. 1918)
78 So. 423

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

The court erred in the oral charge to the jury. Owens v. State, 16 Ala. App. 413, 78 So. 423; Harrell v.…

Stephenson v. State

The state failed to discharge the burden of proof resting upon it. It merely showed that the will in question…