From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Owens v. Mitchem

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA JASPER DIVISION
Sep 6, 2012
Case No. 6:10-cv-01167-LSC-HGD (N.D. Ala. Sep. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 6:10-cv-01167-LSC-HGD

09-06-2012

RAYMOND PAUL OWENS, Petitioner v. BILLY MITCHEM, Warden, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA, Respondents


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On July 10, 2012, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. No objections have been filed by the petitioner or the respondents.

After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the magistrate judge that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied.

A separate order in conformity with this Memorandum Opinion will be entered contemporaneously herewith.

____________

L. SCOTT COOGLER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Owens v. Mitchem

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA JASPER DIVISION
Sep 6, 2012
Case No. 6:10-cv-01167-LSC-HGD (N.D. Ala. Sep. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Owens v. Mitchem

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND PAUL OWENS, Petitioner v. BILLY MITCHEM, Warden, and THE ATTORNEY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA JASPER DIVISION

Date published: Sep 6, 2012

Citations

Case No. 6:10-cv-01167-LSC-HGD (N.D. Ala. Sep. 6, 2012)

Citing Cases

Rogers v. Boyd

While Petitioner contends that his claims challenging the validity of his conviction and sentence present a…

Pope v. Butler

While Pope argues that his claim challenging the validity of his conviction and sentence presents a…