From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Owens v. Gooley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Dec 6, 2012
5:12CV00159 SWW/JTR (E.D. Ark. Dec. 6, 2012)

Opinion

5:12CV00159 SWW/JTR

12-06-2012

LANCE MITCHELL OWENS, ADC #610855 PLAINTIFF v. JOYCE GOOLEY, Mail Room Supervisor; and WILLIAM STRAUGHN, Warden; Maximum Security Unit DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (docket entry #35) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Straughn and Gooley are DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, due to a lack of exhaustion.

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (docket entry #32) is DENIED, AS MOOT.

3. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.

Susan Webber Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Owens v. Gooley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Dec 6, 2012
5:12CV00159 SWW/JTR (E.D. Ark. Dec. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Owens v. Gooley

Case Details

Full title:LANCE MITCHELL OWENS, ADC #610855 PLAINTIFF v. JOYCE GOOLEY, Mail Room…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Dec 6, 2012

Citations

5:12CV00159 SWW/JTR (E.D. Ark. Dec. 6, 2012)