From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Owaid v. Country-Wide Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 22, 2004
5 A.D.3d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-01145.

Decided March 22, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for non-payment of medical services rendered to the defendant's insureds, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated January 13, 2003, which granted the defendant's motion to vacate a judgment of the same court (Archer, J.H.O.), dated October 7, 2002, entered upon the defendant's default in appearing and answering.

Lichtenberg Roseman, New York, N.Y. (Stephen M. Roseman of counsel), for appellant.

Jaffe Nohavicka (Thomas Torto and Jason Levine, New York, N.Y. of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the motion to vacate is denied, and the judgment is reinstated.

A defendant attempting to vacate a default judgment must establish both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense ( see Roussodimou v. Zafiriadis, 238 A.D.2d 568). While the determination of what constitutes a reasonable excuse for a default lies within the sound discretion of the trial court ( see Bardales v. Blades, 191 A.D.2d 667), reversal is warranted where the court improvidently exercises its discretion. The court has discretion to accept law office failure as a reasonable excuse but "a pattern of willful default and neglect" should not be excused ( Roussodimou v. Zafiriadis, supra).

The court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant's motion to vacate its default. The only excuse offered, "due to a clerical error, the summons and complaint were not matched to the appropriate file" was insufficient under the circumstances of this case ( see Ortiz v. Delmar Recycling Corp., 244 A.D.2d 392). Moreover, the defendant failed to present any reasonable excuse for its various other defaults in this case including the failure to appear at the inquest and the failure to take any steps to vacate the default until the City Marshall levied an execution on its personal property.

SANTUCCI, J.P., SMITH, LUCIANO and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Owaid v. Country-Wide Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 22, 2004
5 A.D.3d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Owaid v. Country-Wide Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:NIHAD OWAID, ETC., appellant, v. COUNTRY-WIDE INSURANCE COMPANY, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 22, 2004

Citations

5 A.D.3d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
774 N.Y.S.2d 748

Citing Cases

In re Hartford Ins. Co.

In support of its motion to vacate an order dated November 8, 2002, which, upon its default in opposing the…

Carnegie Hill Orthopedic Serv. v. Travelers Prop. Cas.

PER CURIAM: The complaint was appropriately dismissed for failure to comply with court-ordered discovery.…