From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Otto v. Wegner

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 27, 1958
11 Misc. 2d 499 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)

Opinion

February 27, 1958

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of The Bronx, LOUIS PECK, J.

Milton H. Ellerin for appellants.

Joseph R. Pisani for third-party plaintiffs-respondents.


Under the present statute (Civ. Prac. Act, § 193-a) impleader is permitted when the third party is liable to defendant "for all or part of the plaintiff's claim against him".

Impleader in this instance, for affirmative relief against the third-party defendant for damages independently claimed to have been sustained by the third-party plaintiff and which claim has no bearing upon the claim of the main plaintiff, should not have been allowed and the application to dismiss the second cause of action in the third-party complaint should have been granted. (See Victory Painters Decorators v. Miller, 198 Misc. 196.)

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted.

HECHT, J.P., AURELIO and TILZER, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Otto v. Wegner

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 27, 1958
11 Misc. 2d 499 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)
Case details for

Otto v. Wegner

Case Details

Full title:THEODORE J. OTTO, Respondent, v. JOHN L. WEGNER et al., Defendants and…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1958

Citations

11 Misc. 2d 499 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)
172 N.Y.S.2d 115

Citing Cases

Green Castle A. Mgmt Corp. v. B&V Dev.

Accordingly, Supreme Court properly dismissed the third-party complaint against Occidental."]; Lucci at 993).…

Marine Midland v. Bowker

Prior to Cohen (supra), if a plaintiff sued a defendant who, as third-party plaintiff, impleaded a…