From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Otonicar v. Shoreline Towers Phase I Condominium

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 22, 1989
382 S.E.2d 418 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

A89A0653.

DECIDED MAY 22, 1989.

Action on assessments. Cobb State Court. Before Judge Nix.

Jerome C. Ware, for appellant.

Charles L. Dunn, for appellee.


The appellee sued the appellant to recover unpaid assessments allegedly owed under a condominium declaration. The case proceeded to trial, and at the close of the appellee's evidence the trial court denied a motion by the appellant for directed verdict. Immediately thereafter, however, the appellee moved for leave to voluntarily dismiss the action pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-41 (a). Such permission was granted, and a voluntary dismissal was thereafter filed by the appellee over the appellant's objection. This appeal followed. Held:

All of the appellant's enumerations of error address the denial of his motion for directed verdict, and he has presented no argument or citation of authority challenging the validity of the dismissal order. Since the effect of a voluntary dismissal is to render the case "completely lifeless for all purposes from the date of the dismissal . . . ," Fulton County v. Corp. c. of Latter Day Saints, 133 Ga. App. 847 (3) ( 212 S.E.2d 451) (1975), any error resulting from the denial of the motion for directed verdict is now moot.

Appeal dismissed. Sognier and Pope, JJ., concur.

DECIDED MAY 22, 1989.


Summaries of

Otonicar v. Shoreline Towers Phase I Condominium

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 22, 1989
382 S.E.2d 418 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Otonicar v. Shoreline Towers Phase I Condominium

Case Details

Full title:OTONICAR v. SHORELINE TOWERS PHASE I CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 22, 1989

Citations

382 S.E.2d 418 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)
382 S.E.2d 418

Citing Cases

Redman Homes, Inc. v. Voss

"[T]he effect of a voluntary dismissal is to render the case `completely lifeless for all purposes from the…

Avnet, Inc. v. Wyle Laboratories, Inc.

Because Avnet was entitled to dismiss its complaint, see Division 1, supra, and because voluntary dismissal…