From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Otey v. CrowdFlower, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 22, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-05524-CRB (MEJ) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cv-05524-CRB (MEJ)

03-22-2013

CHRISTOPHER OTEY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS BIEWALD and CHRIS VAN PELT, Defendants.

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. JACQUELINE E. KALK ARTHUR M. EIDELHOCH GALEN M. LICHTENSTEIN KELLY D. REESE LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS BIEWALD AND CHRIS VAN PELT STEMBER FEINSTEIN DOYLE PAYNE & KRAVEC, LLC MARK A. POTASHNICK WEINHAUS & POTASHNICK Attorneys for Plaintiff CHRISTOPHER OTEY


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER RE: HEARING AND BRIEFING

DATES FOR PENDING MOTIONS


Civil Local Rule 6-2

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the undersigned, counsel of record for Plaintiff Christopher Otey ("Plaintiff") and Defendants CrowdFlower, Inc., Lukas Biewald, and Chris Van Pelt (collectively "Defendants"), do hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

1. The initial case management conference in this action has been set for Friday, April 12, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. Due to scheduling conflicts, Counsel are unable to attend on that date and have conferred and cleared their respective calendars for April 19, 2013.

2. That the following matters currently scheduled for hearing on April 12, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. be continued to April 19, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.: (a) the initial case management conference, (b) hearing on Defendants' Motion to Bifurcate Discovery and to Stay Merits/Class Certification Discovery and (c) Motions, and hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings.

3. That Defendants be provided a two-week extension, to and including April 5, 2013, to file an Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings.

4. That Plaintiff's deadline to file a Reply in support of his Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings is extended until April 12, 2013.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

_______________

JACQUELINE E. KALK

ARTHUR M. EIDELHOCH

GALEN M. LICHTENSTEIN

KELLY D. REESE

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendants

CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS BIEWALD

AND CHRIS VAN PELT

STEMBER FEINSTEIN DOYLE PAYNE &

KRAVEC, LLC

_______________

MARK A. POTASHNICK

WEINHAUS & POTASHNICK

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CHRISTOPHER OTEY

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

_______________

HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Otey v. CrowdFlower, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 22, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-05524-CRB (MEJ) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Otey v. CrowdFlower, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER OTEY, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 22, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cv-05524-CRB (MEJ) (N.D. Cal. Mar. 22, 2013)