From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Osterhout v. Latham

Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District, New Haven, June Term, 1917.[fn*
Jul 6, 1917
101 A. 494 (Conn. 1917)

Opinion

Argued June 12th, 1917

Decided July 6th, 1917.

APPEAL by the defendants from the finding and award of the Compensation Commissioner of the second district in favor of the plaintiff, taken to the Superior Court in Tolland County, from which the cause was transferred by agreement of the parties to the Superior Court in Hartford County, and reserved by that court, Gager, J., upon the finding of the Commissioner and the evidence before him, for the advice of this court. Superior Court advised to dismiss the defendants' appeal.

Warren B. Johnson and Leonard J. Collins, for the appellants (defendants).

William A. King and Samuel B. Harvey, for the appellee (plaintiff).


Swanson v. Latham, ante, p. 87, reaffirmed and followed.


The facts are identical with the companion case, Swanson v. Latham et al.

The decedent, Osterhout, was an employee of the defendants, and the contract of employment with him was the same as with Swanson. He stood in a dual relation to Latham Crane. As the owner of the automobile, he was their agent to transport, in his own automobile, Swanson and the other employees, including himself, from Willimantic to Stafford Springs and back each day, for the sum of ninety cents each day for each employee, including himself. As an employee, his contract of employment during the period of transportation did not differ in any essential from Swanson's and the other employees. So far as the facts disclose, Osterhout's case does not differ from Swanson's.


Summaries of

Osterhout v. Latham

Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District, New Haven, June Term, 1917.[fn*
Jul 6, 1917
101 A. 494 (Conn. 1917)
Case details for

Osterhout v. Latham

Case Details

Full title:CORA T. OSTERHOUT vs. EDWIN B. LATHAM ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District, New Haven, June Term, 1917.[fn*

Date published: Jul 6, 1917

Citations

101 A. 494 (Conn. 1917)
101 A. 494

Citing Cases

Cal. Casualty Indemnity Exch. v. Industrial Acc. Com.

) There is no question that the automobile in the instant case was furnished by the employer to the employees…