From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Osmun v. Osmun

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Nov 4, 2003
125 S.W.3d 326 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81547

November 4, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Franklin County, Honorable Joseph M. Ladd.

Louis B. Eckelkamp III, Washington, Missouri, for appellant.

Prudence Fink Johnson, Union, Missouri, for respondent.

Before Mary R. Russell, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., Booker T. Shaw, J.



ORDER


Thomas M. Osmun ("Husband") appeals from the trial court's judgment dissolving the parties' marriage. On appeal, Husband argues the trial court erred in: (1) characterizing Husband's dental practice as marital property; (2) failing to properly account for Husband's debt in its valuation of his dental practice; (3) finding that the house and nine-acre parcel in Robertsville were marital property; (4) valuing the house in Robertsville, along with the surrounding acreage, at $875,000; (5) characterizing Husband's contribution to the Xelan Foundation as marital property; and (6) characterizing certain debts of Wife as marital debts.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. The trial court's judgment was supported by substantial evidence on the record. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, a memorandum has been provided to the parties, for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Osmun v. Osmun

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Nov 4, 2003
125 S.W.3d 326 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Osmun v. Osmun

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS M. OSMUN, Appellant, v. CYNTHIA M. OSMUN, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Nov 4, 2003

Citations

125 S.W.3d 326 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Osmun v. Osmun

Husband did not make any payments to Wife while the appeal was pending. The judgment of dissolution was…