From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Osborne v. Olean Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 7, 1992
186 A.D.2d 1059 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 7, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County, Sprague, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Boomer, Pine, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: We agree with defendant School District that Supreme Court erred in failing to grant its motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's complaint. The infant, an 11-year-old boy, assumed the risk of being struck by a baseball when he "walked in front of" or "between" his two friends, who were playing catch in an area outside the school that the infant attended. By placing himself between his friends, the infant put himself in danger of being struck by the ball (see, Sutfin v Scheuer, 74 N.Y.2d 697, 698). In the circumstances of this case, the School District breached no duty to protect the infant (see, Marlowe v Rush-Henrietta Cent. School Dist., 167 A.D.2d 820, affd 78 N.Y.2d 1096).


Summaries of

Osborne v. Olean Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 7, 1992
186 A.D.2d 1059 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Osborne v. Olean Board of Education

Case Details

Full title:JANET OSBORNE, as Parent and Natural Guardian of ROBERT S. OSBORNE, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 1059 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
588 N.Y.S.2d 489

Citing Cases

Robinson v. New York City Housing Authority

Plaintiff, who was struck in the eye by a low lying branch of a tree on the field when he jumped on the back…

Griffin v. Lardo

Supreme Court erred in denying defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground…