From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Osborn v. Manning

Supreme Court of Wyoming
Oct 2, 1991
817 P.2d 889 (Wyo. 1991)

Opinion

No. 91-131.

October 2, 1991.

Appeal from the District Court, Natrona County, Harry E. Leimback, J.

Richard B. Osborn, pro se.

Donald Painter, Casper, for appellee.

Before URBIGKIT, C.J., CARDINE, MACY and GOLDEN, JJ., and ROONEY, J. (Retired).


Osborn renews his claim for costs of a fence built in 1983. He sought and was denied summary judgment. He obtained judgment for fence maintenance. Manning does not dispute the judgment for fence maintenance.

In Osborn v. Manning, 798 P.2d 1208 (Wyo. 1990), we reversed dismissal of Osborn's claim for fence maintenance, but ratified our holding res judicata barred the claim for original fence costs. See, Osborn v. Manning, 812 P.2d 545, 547 (Wyo. 1991). Osborn differentiates his new claim, avowing he rebuilt, or modified, much of the fence to ensure compliance with statutory criteria. See, W.S. 11-28-102 (June 1989 Repl.). Nothing else has changed.

We agree with the district court's findings. The new claim does not enhance his position, because the recent work did not alter the original fence's status.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Osborn v. Manning

Supreme Court of Wyoming
Oct 2, 1991
817 P.2d 889 (Wyo. 1991)
Case details for

Osborn v. Manning

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD B. OSBORN, APPELLANT (PLAINTIFF), v. CLARICE LYLE MANNING…

Court:Supreme Court of Wyoming

Date published: Oct 2, 1991

Citations

817 P.2d 889 (Wyo. 1991)

Citing Cases

Osborn v. Painter

In a decision letter issued on February 9, 1989, the county court stated: Previous appeals can be found at…

Osborn v. Kilts

When Kilts purchased his property, conflicts soon arose over the use of an access easement held by Osborn.…